Mula

Mula v. Mula-Stouky

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20225:21-cv-04540California550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PAUL MULA, JR., Case No. 21-cv-04540-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO REVOKE PRO HAC VICE

STATUS OF GERALD NORTH

HELENE MULA-STOUKY, et al., [Re: ECF 87] Defendants.

13

15 This order addresses the Stouky Defendants’ motion to revoke the pro hac vice status of Plaintiff Paul Mula, Jr.’s counsel, Gerald North, which is joined by Defendants Terry Campbell Wallace and Kristofer Biorn. The motion is opposed by Plaintiff. The Court previously vacated the hearing on the motion that had been scheduled for July 21, 2022. See Order Submitting Mot., ECF 149. The motion is DENIED for the reasons discussed below. Under this Court’s Civil Local Rules, the judge assigned to the case has discretion to accept or reject an attorney’s application for admission pro hac vice. See Civ. L.R. 11-3(d). The judge may grant pro hac vice status to an attorney who is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.