Mula
Mula v. Mula-Stouky
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PAUL MULA, JR., Case No. 21-cv-04540-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO REVOKE PRO HAC VICE
STATUS OF GERALD NORTH
HELENE MULA-STOUKY, et al., [Re: ECF 87] Defendants.
13
15 This order addresses the Stouky Defendants’ motion to revoke the pro hac vice status of Plaintiff Paul Mula, Jr.’s counsel, Gerald North, which is joined by Defendants Terry Campbell Wallace and Kristofer Biorn. The motion is opposed by Plaintiff. The Court previously vacated the hearing on the motion that had been scheduled for July 21, 2022. See Order Submitting Mot., ECF 149. The motion is DENIED for the reasons discussed below. Under this Court’s Civil Local Rules, the judge assigned to the case has discretion to accept or reject an attorney’s application for admission pro hac vice. See Civ. L.R. 11-3(d). The judge may grant pro hac vice status to an attorney who is not…