Stolte

Stolte v. Securian Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20224:21-cv-07735California6,883 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHANNON STOLTE, Case No. 21-cv-07735-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

SECURIAN LIFE INSURANCE Re: Dkt. No.

COMPANY,

11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Shannon Stolte alleges that Defendant Securian Life Insurance Company violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) when it denied life insurance benefits for her now-deceased spouse, John Stolte (“J. Stolte.”). Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). [Docket Nos. 27 (“Mot.”), 31 (“Reply”).] Plaintiff opposed. [Docket No. 28 (“Opp’n”).] The court held a hearing on the motion on March 10, 2022. For the following reasons, the court grants Defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are derived from the FAC. J. Stolte participated in a health and welfare plan (the “Plan”) sponsored by his employer Allstate that included life insurance coverage for eligible employees. FAC ¶¶ 2, 6. Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.