Palmer v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division LAWRENCE PALMER, et al., Case No. 22-cv-02178-VC (LB)

Plaintiffs,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: ECF No. 150 HSBC BANK, USA, N.A., Defendant. 16 INTRODUCTION The parties dispute whether the defendant must serve supplemental responses to the plaintiff’s written discovery requests.1 The plaintiff argues that the defendant’s responses to the plaintiff’s (1) Requests for Production Nos. 1–11, 13–26, 29–38 and (2) Interrogatories Nos. 1–33 are improper or incomplete.2 The plaintiff also challenges the defendant’s failure to (1) provide a privilege log, (2) verify the responses to the interrogatories “under oath,” and (3) produce unredacted copies of responsive documents.3 The defendant counters that the material the plaintiff’s seeks is beyond the scope of permissible discovery because (1) the only remaining claims are the plaintiff’s individual

1 Disc. Letter – ECF No. 150.…