Pizarro

Pizarro v. Quinstreet, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20223:22-cv-02803California2,766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHARON PIZARRO, Case No. 22-cv-02803-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;

DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST

QUINSTREET, INC., FOR DISMISSAL; STAYING ACTION;

VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT

Defendant. CONFERENCE

12 Before the Court is defendant QuinStreet, Inc.’s (“QuinStreet”) “Motion to Compel Arbitration,” filed July 8, 2022. Plaintiff Sharon Pizarro (“Pizarro”) has filed opposition, to which QuinStreet has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND In her Complaint, Pizarro alleges QuinStreet is a “marketing company” that “sells consumer contact information to lenders” in exchange for referral fees. (See Compl. ¶ 4.) Specifically, Pizarro alleges, QuinStreet “harvests consumer lead information and telephone numbers” through…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.