Sifuentes

Sifuentes v. Dropbox, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20224:20-cv-07908California660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, Case No. 20-cv-07908-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

DROPBOX, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 65 Defendant.

12 Defendant Dropbox, Inc. has filed a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration, Dkt. No. 65 (“Mot.”), of the Court’s June 29, 2022 Order Denying Motion to Compel Arbitration. See Dkt. No. 57 (“Order”). Plaintiff submitted an opposition, Dkt. No. 71, and the Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered Defendant’s motion, the Court DENIES it. Civil Local Rule 7-9 allows a party to seek reconsideration on the following bases:

(1) That at the time of the motion for leave, a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the Court before entry of the interlocutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.