Kelly

Kelly v. Atenly

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20224:22-cv-02915California1,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES CARL KELLY, Case No. 22-cv-02915-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE

DENIED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

ATENLY, et al., FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. Re: ECF No.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied pursuant to the three strikes provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). DISCUSSION Plaintiff is a frequent litigant. Plaintiff has filed at least fourteen civil rights cases in this district, see, e.g., Kelly v. Gates, C No. 22-cv-03451 JST; Kelly v. Allen, C No. 22-02719 JST; Kelly v. Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison, C No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.