Mula

Mula v. Mula-Stouky

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20225:21-cv-04540California10,279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PAUL MULA, JR., Case No. 21-cv-04540-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART THE STOUKY

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT,

HELENE MULA-STOUKY, et al., WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; AND

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

Defendants. IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

SUPPLEMENT HIS PLEADING

13 [Re: ECF 66, 146] 14

16 Plaintiff Paul Mula, Jr. (“Paul Jr.”) sues members of his family, court-appointed conservators and attorneys, and others claiming that they conspired to deprive him of assets of his deceased grandmother’s trust that were intended for him. Based on that alleged conspiracy, he asserts a RICO1 claim and related claims under federal and state law. Three sets of defendants have filed motions to dismiss the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”). The first two motions, brought by Defendants Kristofer Biorn and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.