Mula
Mula v. Mula-Stouky
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20225:21-cv-04540California10,279 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PAUL MULA, JR., Case No. 21-cv-04540-BLF
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART THE STOUKY
v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT,
HELENE MULA-STOUKY, et al., WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; AND
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
Defendants. IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
SUPPLEMENT HIS PLEADING
13 [Re: ECF 66, 146] 14
16 Plaintiff Paul Mula, Jr. (“Paul Jr.”) sues members of his family, court-appointed conservators and attorneys, and others claiming that they conspired to deprive him of assets of his deceased grandmother’s trust that were intended for him. Based on that alleged conspiracy, he asserts a RICO1 claim and related claims under federal and state law. Three sets of defendants have filed motions to dismiss the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”). The first two motions, brought by Defendants Kristofer Biorn and…