Rouse

Rouse v. Pitkin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20223:21-cv-05493California1,044 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 XEZAKIA ROUSE, Case No. 21-cv-05493-AGT

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

AND RESOLVING MISCELLANEOUS

GARY PITKIN, MOTIONS Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 32, 37, 41,

13 Xezakia Rouse, an Ohio resident proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action against Napa Police Lieutenant Gary Pitkin, alleging violations of his constitutional rights and various federal and state statutes. The Court previously granted Pitkin’s motion to dismiss the original complaint in its entirety under Rule 12(b)(6), and dismissed with prejudice all but three of Rouse’s claims. Dkt. 38. The remaining three claims, asserting violations of equal protection, due process, and the California Public Records Act (“CPRA”), were dismissed with leave to amend. The Court gave Rouse specific instructions on how to cure the defects in those claims and made clear that any amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.