Gosain

Gosain v. Berquist Wood McIntosh Seto LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20224:18-cv-06343California3,280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division RAJIV GOSAIN, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06343-HSG (LB)

Plaintiffs,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: ECF Nos. 190, 191, 192 BERGQUIST WOOD MCINTOSH SETO, LLP, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 The parties continue to dispute the following issues: (1) the plaintiffs’ failure to serve verified supplemental responses to the defendant Merlin Law Group’s requests for production and interrogatories; (2) the plaintiffs’ unilateral cancellation of the depositions of Mr. Gosain and other witnesses on short notice; (3) the plaintiffs’ insufficient Rule 26 disclosures; (4) the plaintiffs’ failure to permit an inspection of property in Orinda, California; (5) the piecemeal production of documents by non-party witness Neil Ison; and (6) the plaintiffs’ deficient responses to requests for production and interrogatories served by defendants Bergquist Wood McIntosh Seto LLP, Bruce McIntosh, and Stephen Seto.1 25 26 27 1 Disc. Letters – ECF Nos. 190,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.