Saxton
Saxton v. County of Sonoma
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHELLE SAXTON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-09499-SI
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 36, 38 Defendants.
12 Defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint was scheduled for a hearing on August 12, 2022. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court vacated the hearing. The Court grants limited leave to amend as set forth in this order; the amended complaint shall be filed by August 30, 2022. The Court has reviewed the second amended complaint (“SAC”) and concludes that with the inclusion of the newly-added allegations, plaintiffs have stated a claim under the second and third causes of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for unconstitutional policy, practice or policy and inadequate training/policy of inaction. However, the Court concludes that plaintiffs have not cured the…