Brown
Brown v. NATURES PATH FOODS, INC.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MOLLY BROWN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05132-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT
NATURES PATH FOODS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 60 Defendant.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Dkt. No. 60 (“Mot.”). Defendant Nature’s Path Foods, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Nature’s Path”) opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 65 (“Opp.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed their original complaint in July 2021, alleging that the protein representations on the labels of more than fifty Nature’s Path products (the “Products”) are false and misleading because they overstate the amount of protein provided and fail to include the legally required “daily…