Tolbert

Tolbert v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20223:22-cv-01467California2,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KIM E. TOLBERT, Case No. 22-cv-01467-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 11 Defendants. 12 On August 12, 2022, the Court held a hearing by zoom on defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. After some technical issues, plaintiff Kim Tolbert was able to join the zoom hearing and was able to listen to the proceedings although she did not verbally participate. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion without leave to amend. 17 BACKGROUND I. Tolbert v. City and County of San Francisco Dep’t of Public Health, et al., Case No. 16- cv-00810 JD2 20 On February 18, 2016, plaintiff Kim E. Tolbert filed a lawsuit against the City and County 21 of San Francisco, the San Francisco Department of Public Health, and Barbara Garcia. According 22 to the third amended complaint, Tolbert had been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.