Barron

Barron v. City of Sausalito

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20223:22-cv-03113California584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MECHEL BARRON, Case No. 22-cv-03113-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

CITY OF SAUSALITO, et al., Defendants.

12 13 Previously, the Court issued an order directing Ms. Barron to show cause why her case should continue and, if so, what federal claims she has which would be the basis for this Court to assert federal jurisdiction. See Docket No. 38 (order). Ms. Barron has now filed a response to the order to show cause (“OSC”). In her response, Ms. Barron makes three main assertions: (1) two law enforcement officers (whom she refers to as the Padia brothers) rejected helping her with a housing voucher; (2) the Richardson’s Bay Regional Agency (“RBRA”) has taken advantage of her and other “anchor outs” with the boat buyout program; and (3) the Muir Woods Lodge (where she had temporary housing) was racist, was not clean, and failed to pay her for cleaning work that she did. As relief, Ms. Barron seeks substantial monetary damages…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.