McEnery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN P. MCENERY, Case No. 21-cv-09614-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND STAYING CASE

TOM MCENERY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Tom McEnery, Martin Menne, and MCM Diversified, Inc. Dkt. No. 21. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff John McEnery filed this action in December 2021, asserting a single cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic relations. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) at ¶¶ 18–26. The facts are heavily disputed, although the parties appear to agree that Plaintiff and Defendants have equal ownership over the San…