Hanscom
Hanscom v. Reynolds Consumer Products LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LISABETH HANSCOM, Case No. 21-cv-03434-JSW
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
REYNOLDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 11 Defendants.
12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss the second amended complaint (“SAC”) filed by defendants Reynolds Consumer Products Inc., and Reynolds Consumer Products LLC (collectively, “Reynolds” or “Defendants”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, and it finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Reynolds’ motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Lisabeth Hanscom (“Plaintiff”) alleges that the labeling of Reynolds’ recycling bags misleads consumers into believing that the bags are recyclable and suitable for disposing of recyclable…