Murj, Inc. v. Rhythm Management Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20225:21-cv-00072California4,442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MURJ, INC., Case No. 5:21-cv-00072-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART RHYTHM’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT; DENYING

RHYTHM MANAGEMENT GROUP, REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

INC.,

12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 49 13 Plaintiff Murj, Inc. (“Murj”) asserts a claim in its Second Amended Complaint against Defendant Rhythm Management Group (“Rhythm”) for breach of contract and seeks damages for lost profits, unjust enrichment, annual lost revenue, royalties, specific performance and injunctive relief. Pl.’s Second Am. Compl. (“Second Am. Compl.”), Dkt. No. 44. On November 24, 2021, the Court granted Defendant Rhythm’s first Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. Order Granting Mot. to Dismiss (“First Order”), Dkt. No. 43. Plaintiff Murj filed an amended complaint shortly thereafter. Second Am. Compl., Dkt. No. 44. Before the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.