Austin v. Miller

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TENISHA TATE-AUSTIN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-09319-MMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MILLER

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

JANETTE C. MILLER, et al., DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ SEVENTH

CLAIM FOR RELIEF AS ASSERTED

Defendants. AGAINST MILLER DEFENDANTS;

VACATING HEARING

13 Before the Court is defendants Miller and Perotti Real Estate Appraisals, Inc. 14 (“MPREA”) and Janette C. Miller’s (“Miller”) (collectively, “Miller Defendants”) Motion,1 15 filed June 27, 2022, to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil 16 Procedure, the Seventh Claim for Relief asserted against them in plaintiffs Tenisha Tate- 17 Austin, Paul Austin (collectively, the “Austins”), and Fair Housing Advocates of Northern 18 California’s (“FHANC”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiffs have filed opposition, 19 to which the Miller Defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed 20 in support of and in opposition…