Ardgall

Ardgall v. City of Sausalito

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20223:22-cv-04722California369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MADISON ARDGALL, Case No. 22-cv-04722-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DENYING

CITY OF SAUSALITO, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Defendants. AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Docket Nos. 2-

13 Currently pending before the Court is Ms. Ardgall’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and her motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction. The Court has reviewed Ms. Ardgall’s financial affidavit. Based on that affidavit, it GRANTS her application to proceed in forma pauperis. Furthermore, because Ms. Ardgall has raised a claim implicating Martin v. Boise, 920 F.3d 584 (9th Cir. 2019), the Court orders the U.S. Marshals Office to serve her summons and complaint on Defendants. Turning to Ms. Ardgall’s motion for a TRO and a preliminary injunction, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.