Jeong

Jeong v. Nexo Financial LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20225:21-cv-02392California10,737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JUNHAN JEONG, Case No. 21-cv-02392-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

NEXO CAPITAL INC.’S MOTION TO

NEXO CAPITAL INC., DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 56]

13 Before the Court is Defendant Nexo Capital Inc.’s (“Nexo”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff 14 Junhan Jeong’s second amended complaint in this breach of contract and consumer protection case 15 regarding Nexo’s Crypto Credit service, which allows users to take out loans against cryptocurrency 16 collateral. Plaintiff alleges in response to an action filed by the Securities and Exchange 17 Commission (“SEC”) targeting the cryptocurrency Ripple (“XRP”), Nexo limited the use of Ripple 18 on its platform in response to its cratering price, causing customers to default on loans taken out 19 against XRP collateral. Plaintiff alleges that Nexo’s conduct breached the duty of good faith…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.