Wu
Wu v. Ferrovial Services Infrastructure Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHU WU, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-09447-WHO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON MOTION FOR
v. ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS, AND
CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AWARDS
FERROVIAL SERVICES INFRASTRUCTURE INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 11 Defendants.
12 On August 24, 2022, this Court conducted a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and a Class Representative Incentive Awards. Having carefully considered the papers, evidence, and arguments presented, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. The Court finds that the requested award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $50,000, or one-third of the common fund created by the settlement, is reasonable for a contingency fee in a class action such as this. See Laffitte v. Robert Half Int’l Inc., 1 Cal. 5th 480 (2016) (affirming award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of one-third of the non-reversionary common fund); Van Vranken v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 901 F. Supp. 294, 297 (N.D. Cal. 1995) (“the…