James

Miloedu, Inc. v. James

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 24, 20223:21-cv-09261California1,435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 MILOEDU, INC., Case No. 21-cv-09261-JST (RMI)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

LYBROAN DENNIS JAMES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 82 Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion (dkt. 82) seeking attorneys’ fees due to certain discovery misconduct committed by Defendants and their counsel. The court will not repeat the essence of the now-adjudicated discovery disputes (see Ltr. Br. (dkt. 80) at 1-5), nor is it necessary to repeat the court’s previous findings that those disputes were entirely the consequence of the unreasonable positions, frivolous objections, and baseless arguments advanced by Defendants and their counsel (see Order of August 8, 2022 (dkt. 81) at 1-8). Instead, the court will only reiterate its previous findings that Defendants and their counsel had engaged in a pattern of willful obstructionism and bad faith in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.