Wescott

Wescott v. SparkLabs IoT Accelerator Fund, L.P.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20223:21-cv-09200California1,322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARL A. WESCOTT, Case No. 21-cv-09200-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DECLINING TO ADOPT

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION;

v. DIRECTIONS TO CLERK;

DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH

SPARKLABS IOT ACCELERATOR LEAVE TO AMEND FUND, L.P., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is a "Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Plaintiff's Case Without Prejudice Due to Failure to Notify of Address Change," filed August 22, 2022. Having fully reviewed the matter, the Court rules as follows. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends the instant action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In particular, the Report and Recommendation notes that (1) after plaintiff did not appear at a scheduled case management conference, the Magistrate Judge issued an order directing plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, to explain why he did not appear at a conference, (2) the order was returned as undeliverable, and (3) following the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.