Woodruff

Woodruff v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20223:22-cv-04194California462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 KATIE WOODRUFF, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04194-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

ATLAS VAN LINES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 4 Defendants.

11 This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts 1, 2, and 4. (Dkt. No. 4.) Plaintiffs filed a non-opposition statement to Defendants’ motion. (Dkt. No. 14.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7–1(b), this matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts 1, 2, and 4. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff Matt Childers accepted an offer to work for Meta, Inc., FNA Facebook, Inc. in Redmond Washington. (Dkt. No. 1-1 at 6.) At the time, Childers and plaintiff Katie Woodruff resided in Tiburon, California. (Id.) Meta provided a paid relocation package for Plaintiffs. (Id.) Defendants packed and loaded Plaintiffs’ household goods in California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.