Beluca Ventures LLC v. Einride Aktiebolag

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20223:21-cv-06992California4,646 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BELUCA VENTURES LLC, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06992-WHO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

EINRIDE AKTIEBOLAG, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 41 Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Beluca Ventures LLC and Christian Lagerling (collectively “Beluca”) have sued defendants Einride Aktiebolag and Einride US Inc. (collectively “Einride”) and Does 1–10 for breach of contract and various non-contract claims. Einride seeks judgment on the pleadings for all of the quasi-contract claims against Einride Aktiebolag (“Einride AB”) and all claims against Einride US Inc. (“Einride US”). I agree with Einride that Beluca has not pleaded facts showing that the alleged oral agreement may be unenforceable and thus cannot bring quasi-contract claims in the alternative. Nor has Beluca pleaded facts to support its conversion claim. Finally, Beluca has not plausibly alleged any claims against Einride US, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.