In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20225:19-cv-04286California788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 IN RE GOOGLE ASSISTANT PRIVACY Case No. 19-cv-04286-BLF

LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTY

APPEN BUTLER HILL INC.’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL [Re: ECF No. 237]

12 Before the Court is non-party Appen Butler Hill Inc.’s (“Appen”) administrative motion to file under seal documents filed in support of its motion for relief from nondispositive pretrial order of Judge van Keulen (ECF No. 236; “Motion for Relief”). See Motion, ECF No. 237. Appen seeks to seal in its entirety a July 1, 2016 Statement of Work (“Statement of Work”) between Appen and Defendants Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. (collectively, “Google”). Further, Appen seeks to seal portions of its Motion for Relief that quote from or summarize the Statement of Work. No opposition to Appen’s sealing motion has been filed. Based on the below reasoning, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.