Estate of Charles Chivrell v. City of Arcata

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 25, 20224:22-cv-00019California5,952 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ESTATE OF CHARLES CHIVRELL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-00019-HSG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART THE CITY

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF ARCATA, et al., AND GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART THE STATE

Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 21, 26,

13 Before the Court are two motions to dismiss. One is filed by Defendants City of Arcata, Arcata Police Department (“APD”), APD Police Chief Brian Ahearn, APD Sergeant Brian Hoffman, and APD Officer Joseph Rodes (collectively, the “City Defendants”), Dkt. No. 21, and another is filed by Defendants State of California, California Highway Patrol (“CHP”), and CHP Officer Michael Griffin (collectively, the “State Defendants”), Dkt. No. 26. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the City Defendants’ motion and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the State…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.