Clark v. Bay City Auto

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 29, 20223:22-cv-04066California1,163 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LOUREECE STONE CLARK, Case No. 22-cv-04066-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

v. TO AMEND

BAY CITY AUTO, et al., Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, an inmate in Marin County Jail, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against numerous car dealerships, the Secretary of the California Department of Motor Vehicles, and the Chief Financial Officer of Wells Fargo Bank. (ECF No. 1 at 2, 4.) For the reasons explained below, the complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended complaint. STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.