Juster

Juster v. Workday, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20223:21-cv-07555California368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BENJAMIN JUSTER, Case No. 21-cv-07555-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DECLINING

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

WORKDAY, INC., et al., Docket Nos. 26, 29, 52 Defendants.

12 13 Previously, the Court granted in part and deferred in part Defendants Workday and HR’s motions to dismiss. Specifically, the Court granted the motions to dismiss Mr. Juster’s FCRA claims but deferred ruling on the state law claims. The Court gave Mr. Juster leave to amend his FCRA claims but noted that, if he decided not to file an amended complaint, then the Court would consider whether to retain supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. See Docket No. 51 (Order at 23). Mr. Juster has now filed a statement, noting that he will not file an amended complaint regarding the FCRA claims that the Court dismissed. Thus, the Court now turns to the issue of supplemental jurisdiction. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c), the Court “may decline to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.