Patterson

Patterson v. Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20225:21-cv-07391California5,304 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN E. PATTERSON,

Case No. 21-cv-07391 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

G. MATTESON,

Defendant. (Docket No. 10)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Warden G. Matteson, for the violation of his right to equal protection. Dkt. No. 1. Finding the complaint stated cognizable claims, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore ordered service upon Defendant. Dkt. No. 6. Defendant Matteson filed a motion for summary judgment based on the following grounds: (1) Plaintiff’s equal protection rights were not violated; (2) Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit; (3) the suit is barred by res judicata; (4) the Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevents the Court from reviewing the state court decisions; and

27 1 All page references herein…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.