Cattoche

Cattoche v. United Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20223:21-cv-01686California768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STORM CATTOCHE, Case No. 21-cv-01686-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SECOND AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT

UNITED AIRLINES, INC., et al., Defendants.

12 Defendants United Airlines, Stephanie Lochmann MacLaran, and Andrew Willson, have asked to dismiss Plaintiff Storm Cattoche’s claims for retaliation, race and gender discrimination, hostile work environment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). Dkt. Nos. 27, 35. The Court dismissed the retaliation and discrimination claims with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 24. Although the second amended complaint (SAC) adds some details, it too does not allege “enough facts to state a claim . . . that is plausible on its face.” Dkt. No. 25; Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). The parties’ familiarity with the record is assumed, and claims one, two, three, four, and five of the SAC are dismissed under Rule 8 and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.