Hamilton

Hamilton v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20225:21-cv-09581California2,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THADDEUS D HAMILTON, Case No. 21-cv-09581-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison (SQSP) formerly proceeding pro se, filed an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment by transferring over 100 inmates, some of whom were infected with COVID- 19, from the California Institution for Men (CIM) to SQSP in May 2020. Plaintiff is now represented by counsel, and his complaint (Dkt. 1) is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Court previously granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. No. 17. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks 23 1 Plaintiff’s case, along with a number of other cases making similar claims about the May 2020 24 CIM-SQSP transfer, was assigned to the Honorable Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.