Suski

Suski v. Coinbase Global, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20223:21-cv-04539California5,187 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID SUSKI, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04539-SK Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MARDEN-KANE, INC., et al., MOTIONS TO DISMISS 10 Defendants. Regarding Docket Nos. 87, 88

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the motions to dismiss filed by Defendant Marden-Kane, Inc. (“Marden-Kane”) and by Coinbase Global, Inc. (“Coinbase”) (collectively referred to as “Defendants”). Having carefully considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, and having had the benefit of oral argument, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART both Defendants’ motion for the reasons set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs David Suski, Jaimee Martin, Jonas Calsbeek and Thomas Maher (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this purported class action on behalf of themselves and persons who opted into 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.