Taylor
Taylor v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 WILLIAM TAYLOR, Case No. 21-cv-08712-WHO Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 40 10 Defendants. 11 Defendants International Union of Painters and Allied Trades (“IPUAT”), Steve Bigelow, Luis F. Robles, James A. Williams, Jr., Robert Collins, Richard Northam, and Clayton McBride (“the defendants”), seek to dismiss pro se plaintiff William Taylor’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), in which Taylor makes 12 allegations that the defendants violated various sections of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (“LMRDA”) and Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (“LMRA”). The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Claims Three, Four, Five, and Twelve are DISMISSED without leave to amend, as they do not sufficiently state a claim for relief arising under any of the relevant statutes. The remaining claims may proceed, but…