Hall

Hall v. Cultural Care, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 31, 20223:21-cv-00926California2,524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MELISSA HALL, Case No. 3:21-cv-00926-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

CULTURAL CARE USA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 91 Defendants.

12 I previously granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs in these consolidated cases on whether they were misclassified as independent contractors by defendant Cultural Care, Inc. See Order on Motions for Summary Judgment (“Prior Order”) [Dkt. No. 88]. Cultural Care moved for leave to file a motion to reconsider, see Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration (“Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 91], which I granted, treated as a motion for reconsideration, and requested responsive briefing to, see Dkt. No. 92. This Order assumes familiarity with the Prior Order. I now clarify the scope of the Prior Order and modify my summary judgment rulings in light of the issues Cultural Care raises. DISCUSSION District courts have inherent authority to modify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.