Floyd

Floyd v. San Jose Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20223:22-cv-00751California894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 22-cv-00751-CRB

Plaintiff,

SUMMARY REMAND ORDER AND

v.

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE

A MOTION FOR

SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et RECONSIDERATION al., 12 Defendants. 13 This case was stayed under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) because 14 entertaining pro se Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd’s federal claims at this time would 15 interfere with his pending state criminal prosecution for (inter alia) carrying a concealed 16 firearm in a vehicle. Order Staying Case (dkt. 56) at 5; People of the State of California v. 17 Michael Devin Floyd, Felony Complaint, Case No. C2111237. 18 Floyd has now filed a putative notice of removal of his state criminal prosecution. 19 See Notice of Removal (dkt. 70). He also asks for leave to file a motion for 20 reconsideration of the order granting the Younger stay. See Mot. for Leave (dkt. 71). 21 Neither filing has any merit. The Court denies the motion for leave to file because the 22 prior decision was correct and Floyd does not satisfy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.