Young

Young v. Valenzuela

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 20223:22-cv-02350California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KENRY LEE YOUNG, Case No. 22-cv-02350-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

v. TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THIS

ORDER BY OCTOBER 10, 2022

E. VALENZUELA,

Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Young filed a complaint, then filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, which I granted. (Dkt. Nos. 1 and 4.) The original complaint was dismissed and Young was ordered to file an amended complaint by August 1, 2022. (Dkt. No. 4 at 1.) That date has passed and no amended complaint has been filed. On or before October 10, 2022, Young shall file a written response to this order. This response shall be either (i) a written statement indicating that he wishes the original complaint to be reinstated and serve as the operative complaint in this suit; or (ii) an amended complaint. No extensions of time will be granted. Failure to file a proper response to this order may result in the dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.