Atlina

Austin v. Atlina

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20224:20-cv-06363California2,647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 4:20-cv-6363-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

vs. Re: Dkt. Nos. 152, 156, 160, 163, 167, 171, 173, 179, 180, 187, 196, 198, 210, & 212 LISA NHU, ET AL.,

Defendants.

16 On February 7, 2022, pro se plaintiff George Jarvis Austin filed his second amended complaint (“SAC”) alleging causes of action for intentional discrimination, invasion of privacy, and whistleblower retaliation. Once again, plaintiff names as defendants: (1) Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. (“GB”), incorrectly sued as Gallagher Bassett; (2) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”); (3) Dr. Lisa Nhu, incorrectly sued as Lisa Nhu Atlina; (4) Sean Ducar; (5) Maribeth Arendt; (6) Everest National Insurance Company (“Everest”), incorrectly sued as Everestre; (7) County of San Joaquin, sued as San Joaquin General Hospital (the “County”); and (8) Guido Gaiteri. 25

Plaintiff’s filing of the SAC was untimely. Since plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.