Atlina
Austin v. Atlina
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 4:20-cv-6363-YGR
Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
vs. Re: Dkt. Nos. 152, 156, 160, 163, 167, 171, 173, 179, 180, 187, 196, 198, 210, & 212 LISA NHU, ET AL.,
Defendants.
16 On February 7, 2022, pro se plaintiff George Jarvis Austin filed his second amended complaint (“SAC”) alleging causes of action for intentional discrimination, invasion of privacy, and whistleblower retaliation. Once again, plaintiff names as defendants: (1) Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. (“GB”), incorrectly sued as Gallagher Bassett; (2) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”); (3) Dr. Lisa Nhu, incorrectly sued as Lisa Nhu Atlina; (4) Sean Ducar; (5) Maribeth Arendt; (6) Everest National Insurance Company (“Everest”), incorrectly sued as Everestre; (7) County of San Joaquin, sued as San Joaquin General Hospital (the “County”); and (8) Guido Gaiteri. 25