Thomas
Thomas v. Pashilk
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HILBERT THOMAS, Case No. 22-cv-01778-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF SERVICE
v.
R. PASHILK, et al., Defendants.
12 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without an attorney, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His Amended Complaint was dismissed in part, and he was granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 35.) He was cautioned as follows:
Failure to amend within the designated time and in accordance with this order will result in the Amended Complaint being the operative complaint, and the case proceeding only with the claims against Defendants Pashilk, Feston, and Campbell. 18 (Id.) Plaintiff has filed a notice that he does not intend to file a Second Amended Complaint and 19 would like to proceed with only his claims against Defendants Pashilk, Feston, and Campbell. 20 (ECF No. 37.) Accordingly, it is hereby ordered as follows: 21 1. The claims against Defendants Oak Smith, E. Sanders, E. Patao, and L. Bravo are…