Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

CATHERINE “CASSIE” DAVIS and JULIA Case N o: 21-cv-03779 SBA

RHODES,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT vs. 9 INMAR, INC. and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 10 Defendants. 11 Plaintiffs Catherine “Cassie” Davis (“Davis”) and Julia Rhodes (“Rhodes”) (together, “Plaintiffs”) bring the instant action against their former employer, Inmar, Inc. (“Inmar” or “Defendant”). Pending is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND A. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS Inmar is a corporation headquartered in North Carolina, with offices located throughout the country, including in California. Def.’s Req. for…