Cappello

Johnson v. Cappello

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20223:21-cv-07590California301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-07590-AGT Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS ROMOLO CAPPELLO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendants. Scott Johnson sued the owners of Fernando’s Mexican Restaurant under the Americans || with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Act, alleging that he encountered accessibility || barriers when he visited their restaurant. In a pending Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of E || subject matter jurisdiction, defendants argue that (1) Johnson’s ADA claim should be dismissed as || moot because the alleged barriers have been removed, and (11) the Court should decline to exercise || supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim. Dkt. 12. Johnson did not file an opposition to defendants’ motion. Instead, he filed a “Notice of Indication of Mootness of ADA Claim for i || Injunctive Relief,” in which he agrees that his ADA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.