RJ
RJ v. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RJ, as the representative of her beneficiary son, SJ; LW, as the representative of her Case No. 5:20-cv-02255-EJD beneficiary spouse MW; and DS, an individual, and on behalf of themselves and ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND all others similarly situated, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST Plaintiffs, AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 75, 76
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.
In this putative class action suit, Plaintiffs challenge Defendant Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc.’s alleged failure to reimburse covered mental health provider claims at the usual, customary, and reasonable (“UCR”) rates. Presently before the Court are two motions to dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint (“FAC”); one brought by Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company (“Cigna”), and a separate motion brought by Defendant MultiPlan, Inc. (“MultiPlan”) …