Rahman

Rahman v. City Of Oakland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20223:22-cv-05038California530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH RAHMAN, Case No. 22-cv-05038-JD

Plaintiff,

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant.

The plaintiff, a homeless person at a Derby Avenue encampment site in Oakland, California, seeks a temporary restraining order (TRO) against agencies and officials of the City of Oakland to prevent a planned closure of the encampment and removal of the plaintiff and his possessions. See Dkt. No. 4. The Court has reviewed the complaint, motion for a TRO, and supporting exhibits. Temporary relief is warranted to preserve the status quo until the defendant appears and responds. Consequently, a TRO is granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b); Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1132 (9th Cir. 2011). Because of the short fuse in the timing of the case, the TRO is issued without notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1). Its terms appear at the end of this order. The Clerk of the Court is requested to issue immediately a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.