Fleming
Fleming v. Provest California LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 BRUNO FLEMING, Case No. 21-cv-04462-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE
PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE
PROVEST CALIFORNIA LLC, et al., JUDGE Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 49]
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Bruno Fleming’s Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and Local Civil Rule 72-2. See ECF No. 49. Plaintiff requests that the Court modify portions of Judge van Keulen’s Order concerning Interrogatory Nos. 14-16 and Requests for Production Nos. 1, 4, 6-8, 16 and 14-20. Id. at 2. 17 A magistrate judge’s nondispositive pretrial order may be modified or set aside if it is 18 “clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). “The magistrate’s factual 19 determinations are reviewed for clear error, and the magistrate’s legal conclusions are reviewed to 20 determine…