Bruzzone

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, Case No. 18-cv-01235-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

JAMES MCMANIS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 71 Defendants.

13 Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reexamination. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for September 22, 2022, is VACATED. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. On October 31, 2018, this court entered judgment and terminated this case. Dkt. 59. On the same date, the court entered an order imposing pre-filing review. Dkt. 58. The court’s final judgment in this case is thus nearly four (4) years old, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit, with writ of certiorari denied. See Bruzzone v. McManis, No. 18-cv-01235- PJH, 2018 WL 5734546, at (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2018), aff’d, 785 F. App’x 503 (9th Cir. 24 …