Diep
Diep v. Apple, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HADONA DIEP, et al., Case No. 21-cv-10063-PJH Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
APPLE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 43 Defendant.
13 Defendant Apple, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint came on for hearing before this court on August 4, 2022. Plaintiffs appeared through their counsel, Elliott Conn and Joshua Whitaker. Defendant appeared through its counsel, Isabelle L. Ord, Ellen E. Dew, and Emily M. Steiner. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Hadona Diep is a resident of the State of Maryland. Dkt. 33, First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ¶ 5. Plaintiff Ryumei Nagao is a resident of Japan. FAC, ¶ 6. Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”), is a California corporation with its principal place of business…