Schoenmann

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARMEL FINANCING, LLC, Case No. 3:21-cv-07387-WHO

Appellant,

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

v. REHEARING

SCHOENMANN, Re: Dkt. No. 15 Appellee.

12 Appellant and cross-appellee Carmel Financing, LLC (“Carmel”) moves for rehearing under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8022 of my recent order resolving the parties’ appeals of several rulings of the Bankruptcy Court. See Motion for Rehearing (“Mot”) [Dkt. No. 15]; Order on Bankruptcy Appeals (“Prior Order”) [Dkt. No. 13]. Under Rule 8022, “[p]etitions for rehearing are designed to ensure that the appellate court properly considered all relevant information in rendering its decision. A petition for rehearing is not a means by which to reargue a party’s case.” In re Hessco Indus., Inc., 295 B.R. 372, 375 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2003) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). This Order assumes familiarity with the Prior Order and the motion. The motion for rehearing is DENIED.…