Ard

Ard v. Boyd

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 20223:22-cv-03764California869 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division MARLIN ARD, Case No. 22-cv-03764-LB

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

HILARY BOYD, et al., Defendants. 16 Marlin Ard, an Oregon-based attorney, sued various Oregon-based defendants over their allegedly biased handling of an Oregon state-court case in which Mr. Ard represented the plaintiff.1 In connection with that case, the Oregon Supreme Court suspended Mr. Ard from the practice of law for one year, effective February 28, 2022.2 (The Oregon Supreme Court justices are defendants in this case.) In December 2020, Mr. Ard sued some of the defendants about the same events in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.3 In this case, he additionally complains of the District of Oregon’s alleged prejudice towards him, and asserts that 24 25 1 Compl. – ECF No. 1; Mutual Release, Ex. 1 to id. – ECF No. 1-2 (setting forth a settlement of the Oregon state-court case). Citations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.