DNA Sports Performance Lab, Inc. v. Major League Baseball
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 DNA SPORTS PERFORMANCE LAB, INC., et al., No. C 20-00546 WHA Plaintiffs, 12 v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION RE
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL, et al., SEALING Defendants. 15
= A prior order told the League and Union to lodge conditionally under seal plaintiff's Z accounting of funds (Dkt. No. 144). The league duly filed a motion to consider whether another party’s material should be sealed (Dkt. No. 146). Our Civil Local Rule 79-5(f)(3) gives the designating party seven days to file a declaration in support of sealing. Two weeks have now passed, and plaintiff has still not filed a supporting declaration. Accordingly, with no factual support justifying sealing of the material, see Kamakana v. City and Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006), the motion is DENIED and the material will be placed on the public docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: September 9, 2022. …