Kinnard

Kinnard v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20224:22-cv-02534California1,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KENNETH KINNARD, Case No. 22-cv-02534-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

STEVE NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.

12 On July 27, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. The Court informed Plaintiff that failure to correct the deficiencies in his pleadings would result in a dismissal of the case under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e) (“Section 1915”). (Id.) Plaintiff filed the second amended complaint (“SAC”) on August 31, 2022. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds the SAC fails to state a claim and DISMISSES the case pursuant to Section 1915(e). BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the original complaint in this action on April 26, 2022. (Dkt. No. 1.) On May 5, 2022, Magistrate Judge Kim granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Section 1915 with leave to amend. (Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.