Davis
Johnson v. Davis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL DAVID JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-01693-JSW Plaintiff, 8 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AS PREMATURE;
RON DAVIS, et al.,
DENYING APPOINTMENT OF
Defendants. COUNSEL Re: Dkt. No. 26 13 Plaintiff’s pro se civil rights case alleges that Defendants were involved in the decision to transfer over 100 prisoners, some of whom were infected with COVID-19, from the California Institute for Men (CIM) to San Quentin State Prison (SQSP) around May 26, 2020, resulting in a COVID-19 outbreak at SQSP. The Court found Plaintiff’s claims cognizable and ordered service on August 4, 2022. Dkt. No. 24. The Court’s service order indicated that the Court “will issue a scheduling order for summary judgment or other dispositive motion briefing after resolution of the common issues in the 22-mc-80066-WHO matter.” Id. No briefing has been ordered yet for this case in the 22-mc-80066-WHO…